How social media will get screwed, Part Three
A couple of years ago I was talking to a friend of mine. She’s the head of a decent sized ad/PR agency here in the DC area. She had someone that had been doing SEO work for her for just a short period move away. It was more project work and he’d no longer be availble. Now no one else at the agency knew SEO or even SEM.
That’s typical of this area. So I mentioned to her that she had a great opportunity to hire someone to provide the service as it is becoming increasingly important in the marketing world. Her agency would stand out.
She responded by saying that she should look to “hire someone young and train them”. Problem is, no one at the agency was knowledgeable enough to teach anyone anything on SEO. It was hire someone young (read cheap) and have them wing it.
Unfortunately, that’s been the attitude of many ad agencies when it’s come to anything related to online marketing. They don’t seek out to learn best practices first. They don’t play a role in any social media. They don’t got to the same conferences. They don’t think they need to. Because they often don’t respect it.
That’s why a lot of ad agencies will build websites full of flash. It looks great but it takes too long to download and search engines can’t find them. Big mistakes but it’s done all the time. It’s part of their portfolio and the client seems pleased, so they consider themselves experts.
That’s why a lot of marketing agencies shove marketing messages down peoples’ throats on social networks. It doesn’t work that well, but the client is on this site and that site and those sites are currently hot.
That’s why a lot of PR firms use less than transparent methods (like flogs) to push forward brands.
With social media, it’s my guess that it will only get worse. A lot of those same ad agencies and PR firms that are currently resisting social media will be finally adopting it in two or three years. Sure, some will still resist and many that go that route will disappear. But those that do take on social media will do so in typical fashion.
Between now and then, they won’t really have attempted to learn much about social media. Sure, they’ll have an agency blog that they’ll post something on every 11 days. Key people may have a Facebook account. But they won’t know the intricacies of the industry because they’ve never paid attention.
So they won’t care about concepts like authenticity and transparency. They’ve never “done” those two things and they won’t understand why they should start now. It will be inconvenient. Just like the 15 out of 16 that Forrester studied are finding out.
But they’ll want to jump in the game. To say they “get it”. So what will they do? They’ll hire someone young (read cheap) and “train” them.
The people they hire may be right out of school. It’s their first job. They’ll be doing what the ego-driven boss says. This new young employee may be pumped that they’ve got this cool new job at the agency downtown. They may not be up to par on the standards that we’ve talked about for years. Or if they are, they may be so desensitized to ethical breaches that they won’t care.
They’ll go along to get along. After all, MOST PEOPLE DO.
I’m saying this because I think that social media is a couple years away from really taking off. Right now it’s big, but it’s not huge. Marketing communications is changing, but often social media types don’t have a set seat at the table. But those PR firms and ad agencies do. And they’ll have the client’s ear just as the client wants to jump into social media.
So this means these marketing communications companies - which should still outnumber social media agencies by far - that are entering the social media space, will be hiring people without extensive backgounds in this field. These new hirees will be carrying out projects designed by their superiors who’ve got the results-driven “shove it down their throats” mentality. It may not seem right, but today we’ve got different level of honesty. Cutting corners is no big deal. Everyone does it. Why challenge the boss?
So incompetently run campaigns will be more common. They’ll be more cleverly hatched than the ones of today. But they’ll still be done poorly. Many won’t get caught. Some will, sullying the industry. Sort of like the way spammers have hurt email. Clients may not know the difference between actual expertise and fluff because they hadn’t been paying attention to online trends. So they’ll go with their current agencies.
This could be commonplace. It could almost become the norm. It could be the way things are done.
I’m just thinking that the standards and guidelines that we talk about today aren’t going to be respected by many practitioners of tomorrow…because they’re too inconvenient to follow.

November 12th, 2008 at 11:08 am
[...] So, I’ll explain what I see the upcoming problem in How Social Media Will Get Screwed, Part Three. [...]
November 14th, 2008 at 12:28 am
I’ve been reading your “How social media will get screwed” series with great interest as I’m in the middle of my own series on the subject. One aspect of social network marketing that concerns me is the potential for brand-destroying backlash. A clumsy, misguided, and inauthentic development of “brand evangelists” seems prone to an extremely nasty reaction if the evangelists decide they’re being led by their collective nose. I’ve yet to run across any anecdotes or statistics on the subject, but as out friend the Ad Contrarian joyfully points out, much of the information in this area is skewed toward the positive, and the negative often gets shoved in the closet when company comes over.
In any event, there is little question that if the social network form of marketing is ever to really reach beyond great success stories for indie bands, mediocre (and generally unmeasurable) success for mid-range businesses, and spectacularly over-hyped success for major brands, somebody is going to have to figure out what really works, and what simply gathers a few thousand “friends” who have never even tried the product.
November 14th, 2008 at 12:33 am
Oops. I just now read your “Beware of the seven percent” which, to a point, deals with an aspect of what I was talking about (although not directly).
As for those “glitches” you mention, such as sloppy user interfaces and bothersome online forms, I’ve taken to calling them “marketing dings” because just like the ding in a car for sale, they may not queer the deal, but then again, they might.
November 14th, 2008 at 11:38 am
Christopher
Thanks so much for you comments!
Here’s a great commentary by Joseph Jaffe regarding social media mistakes and frauds:
http://adage.com/brightcove/single.php?title=1612710731
We’ll see more of them because decision makers will be inclined to shove things down our throats.
That underscores my belief that there will be a battle between traditionalists and social media innovators when social media strategies are established and launched.
December 5th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
[...] cover some of this in Part 3 of my series “How Social Media Will Get Screwed”. Part 1 is here and Part 2 is here. [...]
December 10th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
[...] cover some of this in Part 3 of my series “How Social Media Will Get Screwed”. Part 1 is here and Part 2 is here. [...]
December 26th, 2008 at 3:14 am
Wow. This is EXACTLY what I’ve been saying for some time. In fact, I couldn’t have said it better myself. The only thing I might add is that the ignorance and hubris of agencies that are accustomed to owning their clients’ marketing budgets is exactly what will relegate them inconsequential in the years to come.
In my conversations with creative directors and PR pros, the usual response is “If and when social media/networks become useful/necessary, we’ll just hire someone to help us.” But as you so expertly pointed out, how would they know an expert from a fraud if they’ve barely dipped a toe in the water? There are many hucksters in the new media space right now, so some of the agencies that don’t have the wisdom to immerse themselves in the milieu will get “taken.” And so will their clients.
Carri Bugbee
Social profiles: https://chi.mp/s/carribugbee.mp
December 26th, 2008 at 12:14 pm
Carri
Thanks for stopping by. I agree, the arrogance is going to come back an hurt a lot of agencies. But I also think it’s going to hurt a lot of would-be clients out there who want to only send marketing messages out to their target markets. I believe that marketing messages are still needed and that target markets will always exist, but as media uses continues to change, those techniques will go from the most important by far to one of many.
My guess is that, as with anything, the adoption rate of social media within agencies will be able to be viewed on a sliding scale. Some agencies will fully realize that they need to incorporate these strategies as services and they’ll evolve smoothly. Other agencies will realize that they may not be able to fully pull it off for a variety of reasons, so they’ll look to partner with others based upon expertise.
And then there will be that large chunk of agencies who will resist - just like the ones you pointed out - and then hire, quite late, based upon cost. They’re the ones who will lose the game.